Tuesday, 16 September 2025

EXERCISE 2: ANALYSIS ACADEMIC WRITING

 Please open this link to analyse the article. Please give your ideas about its content including the criteria of effectiveness in academic writing (logic, clearity,  and formality). Put the answers in this blog' comment column. Thank you

21 comments:

  1. Aulia khairunisa
    231250005
    Mpi 5A
    In my opinion, this article works well as an introduction because it not only explains the background but also makes the purpose of the series very clear. The logic is easy to follow since the authors describe why many researchers struggle with writing, and then show how the series will provide step-by-step guidance. I also find the clarity strong, especially when they divide the information into what readers should know and what they should do. It feels structured but not overwhelming. The formal style is kept in line with academic standards, yet the language is still accessible for readers who may not be very experienced. Overall, the article is effective because it combines logical flow, clarity, and a professional tone, which makes it both useful and enjoyable to read.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nama: Awaliyah Nasuha
    NIM: 231250031
    Kelas: MPI - 5A

    In my opinion
    Logic:
    The content of this article is highly relevant because it introduces a structured series aimed at improving the skills of novice and even senior researchers in writing and publishing scientific papers. In terms of logic, the article is well-organized, starting from the rationale for the series, moving to the problems faced by researchers, and concluding with the solutions offered through the series. It follows a clear cause-and-effect structure that strengthens the argument.

    Clearity:
    Regarding clearity, the writing is straightforward and avoids unnecessary jargon, making it accessible to a broad audience. The division of the upcoming series into specific topics (such as title, abstract, methods, results, and responding to reviewers) provides a transparent roadmap that will help readers easily understand the scope and purpose of the initiative.

    Formality:
    As for formality, the article maintains an academic tone by supporting its claims with references, acknowledging contributors, and citing established guidelines such as CONSORT and STROBE. This enhances its credibility and positions it within the scholarly tradition of evidence-based recommendations.

    Overall, the article is effective because it balances informative content with a professional style, making it both practical and academically sound.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nama : Lira Awanda
    NIM : 231250009
    Kelas : MPI 5 A

    This article, titled "Introducing a new series on effective scientific writing and publishing," introduces a series of articles discussing tips for writing and publishing scientific papers effectively. It is primarily aimed at novice researchers, although it is also relevant to experienced researchers. Its primary focus is on providing practical guidance on how to write, from the first draft to dealing with reviewers' comments.

    1. Logic ‎
    This article can be considered logical because its content is structured coherently and is easy to follow. The author begins by explaining the importance of scientific publications, then outlines problems often faced by novice researchers, such as writing difficulties and a lack of systematic direction. After that, the article offers a solution in the form of a monthly series with 12 main topics that discuss the steps of scientific writing, from "How to get started" to "Responding to reviewers." Finally, the author also addresses the limitations of this series, for example, it does not specifically discuss qualitative research or detailed grammar, before concluding with the ultimate goal: to help researchers write more effectively. This flow demonstrates a clear logic of problem, solution, implementation, limitations, and goals.

    2. Clarity
    This article is considered clear because it is presented clearly and concisely. The author uses a format that makes it easy for readers to navigate, dividing each topic into two sections: "What you should know" and "What you should do." This structure helps readers understand the difference between background information and practical advice. Furthermore, each article in the series includes a short checklist summarizing the main points, making the content easier to understand, especially for novice researchers. Clarity is also evident in the table detailing the 12 main topics, giving readers a clear understanding of the scope of the material covered in this series.

    3. Formality ‎
    This article can be considered formal because it is written in an academic style appropriate for a scientific journal. This is evident in the use of neutral and professional language, the mention of scientific references (e.g., Guyatt & Haynes, Knottnerus & Tugwell), and the inclusion of an official DOI. The author also includes acknowledgments to various parties and a bibliography that adheres to international academic standards. Furthermore, the article uses formal terms such as "variables in the writing process determine whether a paper will be accepted," demonstrating objectivity and academic seriousness. All of these elements confirm that the article was written with a high level of formality, in accordance with scientific writing criteria.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Siti Nurul Mafudoh
    231250027
    Mpi 5A

    In my opinion, the content of this article is quite good because it provides a clear overview of the importance of scientific writing skills and how this series of tips can help researchers, especially beginners. In terms of academic writing effectiveness, the article meets the following criteria: Logic → The flow is coherent, starting from the reason for this series, the problems the author frequently encounters, to the explanation of the content of each topic. This makes it easy for readers to follow. Clarity → The language used is clear and to the point, for example, with the "What you should know" and "What you should do" sections. This makes it easy for readers to understand. Formality → The language style remains formal according to scientific journal standards, but remains communicative. It's not too stiff, so it can be enjoyed by both beginners and experienced researchers. In short, this article is effective because it's not only informative but also practical and can be directly used by readers in their scientific writing activities.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nama = Chika Syahfitri
    NIM = 231250025
    Kelas = 5 MPI A

    Menurut saya, artikel ini cukup berhasil sebagai pengantar (Introduction) karena tidak hanya memberikan gambaran awal, tetapi juga menegaskan tujuan dari seri yang akan dibahas. Alurnya juga terasa logis, dimulai dari penjelasan tantangan yang dihadapi peneliti dalam menulis hingga tawaran solusi berupa panduan sistematis. Dari sisi kejelasan, penulis juga menyajikan informasi dengan membedakan antara hal yang perlu dipahami pembaca dan langkah yang harus dilakukan, sehingga terasa mudah diikuti tanpa terasa rumit. Sementara itu, unsur formalitas juga tetap terjaga karena menggunakan gaya akademik yang profesional, namun bahasanya tetap ramah bagi peneliti pemula. menurut saya Keseluruhan tulisan ini juga efektif karena mampu memadukan logika yang runtut, penyampaian yang jelas, serta sikap formal yang sesuai dengan standar publikasi ilmiah.

    Menurut saya ini ialah beberapa kalimat yg bersifat logis dari artikel diatas :
    “Writing and publishing scientific papers is the core business of every researcher.”

    “Good scientific content of a paper alone does not guarantee its publication in a good journal.”

    “Anticipation and modification of such determinants will increase an author’s effectiveness, enabling them to get more done in less time; offering editors, reviewers, and readers a clear storyline; increasing enjoyment and reducing frustration; and raising the likelihood of having a paper accepted by a good journal.”

    “It is perhaps not only the abundance of information but also its sometimes nonspecific nature, which prevents young researchers from getting a clear overview of ways to effectively write and publish a biomedical research paper.”

    Menurut saya ini ialah beberapa kalimat yg bersifat Kejelasan ( clarity) dari artikel diatas :
    “Effective scientific writing, however, is not easy.”

    “Each of the 12 papers of the series is constructed as an easy-to-read one-pager, divided into background information (‘What you should know’) and advice (‘What you should do’).”

    “It is not a specific guide to successful publishing in JCE; its content applies to writing biomedical research papers in general.”

    “We hope that you will enjoy reading the series and that it will increase your pleasure in writing and the acceptance rate of your papers.”

    Menurut saya ini ialah beberapa kalimat yg bersifat Formal dari artikel diatas :
    “This article introduces a series of writing tips that will appear each month in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (JCE) over the next year.”

    “The primary target audience are novice academic researchers, although the series may also be useful for senior researchers who supervise less experienced colleagues.”

    “An exhaustive list of available guidelines and other resources to facilitate good research reporting is provided by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research) network.”

    “This new series of monthly writing tips builds on the existing literature about research reporting in JCE.”

    “The series was written to offer tips and tricks for clear and concise writing and publishing and to support authors in getting their message across to the scientific community.”

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nama : Fariha Bintang Cahyani
    Nim : 231250018
    Kelas : MPI 5A

    The article Introducing a new series on effective writing and publishing of scientific papers emphasizes the importance of effective academic writing and introduces a series of practical tips to support researchers. It fulfills three main criteria of effective academic writing: logic, clarity, and formality.

    In terms of logic, the article is coherent and well-structured. It begins by highlighting the central role of writing in research, discusses common difficulties faced by both junior and senior researchers, and then offers a solution through a series of concise writing guides.

    From the standpoint of clarity, the language is straightforward and the series is divided into two key parts: “what you should know” and “what you should do.” This format ensures that readers receive both context and actionable advice, making it easier for novice researchers to apply.

    Regarding formality, the article maintains an appropriate academic tone, supported by references, guidelines, and citations. Although the advice uses the imperative style, it suits the practical purpose.

    Overall, the article is effective, balancing logical structure, clarity, and scholarly formality.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Nama: Ines Munajah
    NIM : 231250016
    Kelas : MPI 5 A


    In my opinion, this article is effective in achieving its purpose as an introduction to a writing series for novice researchers. It successfully explains the problem, the rationale for creating the series, and the scope of what will be covered, while also offering useful context for readers. The writing is informative and easy to follow, making it valuable not only for beginners but also for more experienced academics who need a refresher.

    Logic
    In terms of logic, the article is well organized and coherent. It starts with the challenges faced by researchers in writing scientific papers, then highlights the insufficiency of existing resources, and finally presents the new series as a practical solution. The argument flows naturally from problem to solution, supported by relevant references and examples, which strengthens the credibility of the content.

    Clarity
    Regarding clarity, the article communicates its ideas in a straightforward and understandable manner. The language used is simple enough for the target audience, and the inclusion of a table listing the topics of the series helps readers grasp the scope quickly. Although there are a few long sentences with many references that may feel dense, the main message remains clear and accessible.

    Formality
    As for formality, the tone is appropriately academic and professional, suitable for publication in a scholarly journal. The authors make use of references, acknowledgments, and established guidelines, which enhance the article’s credibility. At the same time, the style avoids being overly rigid, using expressions such as “do’s and don’ts” to keep the text engaging without losing its scholarly character.

    ReplyDelete
  9. HIKMAH ISLAMIYATI
    NIM. 231250011
    MPI 5A


    In my opinion, this article meets the criteria for effective academic writing, particularly in terms of logic, clarity, and formality. 1. Logic In my opinion, this article has a logical and well-organized structure. It begins with: - Introduction to the problem (this article states that scientific writing and publishing are important, but often difficult for many researchers. It also mentions that existing guidance is sometimes suboptimal), - Solution (this article provides concise and practical guidance on writing articles). - Benefits (this article helps authors become more effective, reduces frustration, and increases the likelihood of their papers being accepted into journals). - Content and format (provides a detailed overview, from writing the first draft to responding to reviewer comments, and proper formatting of each article). 2. Clarity This article is written very clearly and directly to the point, without being convoluted. This article uses clear and easy-to-understand language. The format is also clear, allowing readers to quickly grasp the content. 3. Formality Although this article is only an introduction and provides suggestions, its formality is maintained in accordance with article writing standards.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nama: Tuti Musaropah
    Nim: 231250004
    Prodi: MPI 5 A

    This article is highly relevant and beneficial for the academic community, particularly novice researchers who often encounter difficulties in writing and publishing scientific articles. The emphasis that writing scientific articles is not merely about presenting research content, but also about mastering the skill of structuring a clear, systematic, and communicative line of thought, is an important point that is often overlooked.

    The effort to present a series of short articles in a practical format consisting of background, recommendations, and checklists reflects an applicable and solution-oriented approach. This provides not only theoretical insight but also concrete guidance that authors can directly apply.

    In addition, the provision of open access is a strategic step that supports the democratization of knowledge, especially for researchers in low- and middle-income countries who often face resource constraints. With open access, barriers such as cost and limited literature can be reduced, thereby creating more equitable opportunities to contribute to scientific discourse.

    Thus, this article not only fills a gap in the literature, which has often been too general or theoretical, but also offers practical guidance that has the potential to improve the quality of scientific publications globally. Furthermore, this article can serve as both an inspiration and an important reference in the effort to build a stronger, more inclusive, and more competitive writing culture in the international academic world.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Nama : Siti Khoriyah
    NIM : 231250008
    Kelas : MPI 5A

    This article discusses the importance of effective scientific writing skills, especially for novice researchers. Its purpose is to provide practical guidance from drafting the first version of a paper to responding to reviewers’ comments. The series consists of 12 main topics such as how to get started, writing the abstract, methods, results, discussion, submitting a manuscript, and responding to reviewers.
    In my opinion, this article is very useful because it emphasizes that good scientific content alone is not enough to be published in a reputable journal. Authors also need to master clear, logical, and well-structured writing strategies so that their research message is understandable and convincing for both reviewers and readers.

    Criteria of Effectiveness in Academic Writing

    - Logic
    The article presents a coherent flow: from the urgency of scientific writing, challenges faced by young researchers, to the solution in the form of a writing series. Each argument is supported with references and reasonable explanations, making it easy to follow the logic.

    - Clarity
    The language used is straightforward, concise, and avoids unnecessary complexity. The article also includes Table 1 summarizing the topics, which helps readers grasp both the big picture and the details more easily.

    - Formality
    The article is written in a formal academic style. Word choices are precise, informal expressions are avoided, and every claim is supported with proper references. This reflects the professional standards of scientific publication.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Nama : Aep Saefullah
    NIM : 231250029
    Kelas : MPI 5 A

    Logika :

    Penulisan akademis harus mengikuti alur pemikiran yang logis. Dalam dokumen ini, penulis menyusun ide dengan baik, mulai dari pengenalan tantangan yang dihadapi peneliti hingga solusi yang ditawarkan melalui serangkaian tips. Struktur yang jelas membantu pembaca mengikuti argumen yang disampaikan.


    Kejelasan :

    Kejelasannya adalah kunci dalam menyampaikan informasi ilmiah. Dokumen ini berusaha menyajikan informasi dalam format yang mudah dibaca dan dipahami, dengan pembagian yang jelas antara informasi latar belakang dan saran praktis. Ini sangat bermanfaat bagi penulis pemula yang memerlukan panduan langsung.


    Formalitas :

    Penulisan akademis umumnya mengharuskan penggunaan bahasa formal. Meskipun dokumen ini berusaha memberikan saran dalam bentuk imperatif—yang mungkin tidak biasa dalam konteks akademis—pendekatan ini dapat meningkatkan pemahaman dan pedoman penerapan yang diberikan. Namun, penting untuk tetap menjaga kesopanan dan profesionalisme dalam ekosistem.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Nama : Erika Ulan Dari
    NIM :231250001
    Kelas: MPI 5A
    Menurut saya:
    Logika:
    Isi artikel ini sangat relevan karena menyajikan sebuah seri yang terstruktur untuk membantu meningkatkan kemampuan penulisan dan publikasi ilmiah, baik bagi peneliti pemula maupun yang sudah berpengalaman. Secara logis, artikel ini disusun dengan baik — dimulai dari alasan di balik dibuatnya seri ini, dilanjutkan dengan pemaparan permasalahan yang dihadapi oleh para peneliti, dan diakhiri dengan solusi yang ditawarkan melalui seri tersebut. Artikel ini menggunakan pola sebab-akibat yang jelas, sehingga memperkuat argumen yang disampaikan.
    Kejelasan:
    Dari segi kejelasan, tulisan ini disampaikan secara lugas dan menghindari penggunaan istilah teknis yang tidak perlu, sehingga dapat dipahami oleh khalayak luas. Pembagian seri yang akan datang ke dalam topik-topik khusus (seperti judul, abstrak, metode, hasil, dan tanggapan terhadap reviewer) memberikan gambaran yang jelas, sehingga memudahkan pembaca dalam memahami cakupan dan tujuan dari inisiatif ini.
    Tingkat Formalitas:
    Dari segi formalitas, artikel ini mempertahankan nada akademik dengan menyertakan referensi yang mendukung pernyataan, mengakui kontribusi pihak terkait, serta mengutip pedoman yang telah diakui seperti CONSORT dan STROBE. Hal ini meningkatkan kredibilitas tulisan dan menempatkannya dalam tradisi ilmiah yang berlandaskan pada rekomendasi berbasis bukti.

    Secara keseluruhan, artikel ini efektif karena mampu menyeimbangkan antara isi yang informatif dan gaya penulisan profesional, sehingga bersifat praktis sekaligus memiliki landasan akademik yang kuat.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Nama : Muhamad Fadil Idris
    NIM : 231250006
    Kelas : MPI 5A

    I think the content of this article is very effective in conveying its message, such as:

    Logic: The authors of this article have a very strong reason for creating a series of writing tips. According to the article, writing scientific papers is difficult, even for experienced researchers. While many books and guides are available, they are often too general and don't immediately provide a clear picture of what to do. Therefore, they created a new series that is more practical, direct, and to the point to help young researchers. Furthermore, the language in the article is easy to understand.

    Clarity: The text of this article is very clear. The authors immediately make it clear that their target audience is novice researchers, but this series can also be useful for experienced researchers who are mentoring others. They also mention that each article will be divided into two parts: "What you need to know" and "What you should do," and include a checklist in each article. This clarity makes readers immediately know what they will get from this series.

    Formality: Although this article is academic, it is not stuffy. The authors use relatively straightforward and to-the-point language. They even employ a slightly personal tone, for example, when they recount their own experiences starting their writing careers and reviewing other people's manuscripts as members of the editorial board. This makes the article feel more honest and relevant. Despite this, the structure and content remain professional, complete with references to support their claims. Ultimately, the article successfully blends the required formality with a friendly and accessible tone.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nama : Faizatun Nisa Al-Karimah
    NIM : 231250019
    Kelas : MPI 5A

    The article introduces a new series on effective writing and publishing of scientific papers, targeting novice academic researchers but also beneficial to senior researchers. It emphasizes how successful scientific writing is crucial for researchers’ careers and advancing knowledge, yet many struggle due to lack of structured guidance. The series aims to provide concise, practical advice covering the entire writing and publishing process, improving clarity, completeness, and transparency, supported by well-established guidelines.

    #Analysis of Content
    The article is well-structured, starting with the rationale for the series, the typical challenges faced by researchers, and the practical solution offered. It acknowledges existing literature but identifies the need for more accessible, experience-based tips. The clear breakdown of topics to be covered (e.g., how to start, title, methods, results, responding to reviewers) shows comprehensive coverage of the writing process.

    #Effectiveness Criteria
    * Logic : The article is logically organized, presenting the problem (difficulty in scientific writing), the gap (existing guidelines are too broad or nonspecific), and the proposed solution (a focused series of tips). It uses a stepwise flow, which guides the reader from problem identification to practical help.

    * Clarity : The language is clear and straightforward, avoiding unnecessary jargon. The authors explain why the series is needed and how it complements existing guidelines. The use of short, focused papers with checklists enhances user-friendliness and clarity for readers.

    * Formality : The tone is formally appropriate for an academic journal. It uses professional language and references authoritative sources. The imperative tone for advice sections, though unusual for the journal, appropriately fits the instructional purpose.

    #Conclusion
    Overall, the article is an effective piece of academic writing. It balances formality with accessibility and is logical and clear in presenting the need for better scientific writing support. The series itself promises to enhance researchers’ abilities to write and publish more successfully, providing structured, practical guidance in a user-friendly format.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Aulia Novi Santoso
    231250033
    MPI 5A

    This article, "Introducing a new series on effective writing and publishing of scientific papers," serves as an introduction to a forthcoming 12-part series in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (JCE). The series is designed to help novice academic researchers and even senior researchers improve their skills in writing and publishing scientific papers.

    Critique of the Article's Effectiveness
    From a rhetorical and academic standpoint, the article is effective because it clearly outlines a problem and presents a well-structured solution.

    Logika dan Kejelasan (Logic and Clarity)
    - Problem Identification: The authors logically begin by establishing the problem: effective scientific writing is difficult, and existing resources are often too abundant and non-specific for young researchers.
    - Proposed Solution: They then introduce the new series as a targeted solution. They specify that the series will be composed of 12 concise, easy-to-read, one-page papers that provide "clear and concise key information".
    - Structure and Content: The article clearly lists the topics the series will cover, ranging from "How to get started" to "Responding to reviewers," demonstrating a comprehensive and logical progression through the publishing process. The format of each paper, with sections for "What you should know" and "What you should do," is also a clear and practical approach.

    Formalitas (Formality)
    The article maintains an appropriate academic tone while being accessible to its target audience. It is formal in its structure and language but avoids being overly stiff. For example, the authors mention that the series will use the imperative ("What you should do"), which is "unusual in JCE" but fits the series' goal of providing direct, experience-based advice. This choice demonstrates a thoughtful balance between scholarly formality and practical utility. The inclusion of an acknowledgment section and a reference list adheres to standard academic publishing conventions.

    Overall, the article effectively communicates its message by outlining a clear problem and a pragmatic solution. It successfully introduces a new resource and justifies its value, adhering to the very principles of effective communication it intends to teach.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Nama : Iin Anisah
    NIM : 231250007
    Kelas : MPI - 5A

    In my opinion, the article is interesting because it introduces a series of guidelines designed to help researchers improve their skills in writing and publishing scientific papers more effectively. The series covers essential topics throughout the writing process, from drafting the first manuscript to responding to reviewers’ comments. With a simple yet systematic approach, the article addresses the real needs of researchers, especially beginners in the academic field.

    Logic:
    From a logical perspective, the article is arranged in a well-structured order. It first emphasizes the importance of scientific writing, then explains the challenges commonly faced by researchers, and finally offers a solution through the proposed series of short papers. This cause-and-effect pattern strengthens the argument and makes it easier for readers to understand both the rationale and the benefits of the initiative.

    Clarity:
    In terms of clarity, the article uses accessible language that avoids unnecessary technical jargon, making it easy for a wide audience to follow. The inclusion of a list of topics, such as titles, abstracts, methods, results, and responding to reviewers, provides a clear overview of the series. This organization allows readers to quickly grasp the scope and purpose of the program.

    Formality:
    Regarding formality, the article maintains an academic tone by citing references, acknowledging contributions, and referring to internationally recognized guidelines. The style of writing reflects academic seriousness while remaining approachable for novice researchers. This balance between formal tone and practical delivery makes the article professional and relevant at the same time.

    Overall, the article is effective because it presents relevant, logical, and clear information while upholding academic formality. It not only introduces a helpful series of writing tips but also shows how academic communication can be professional yet accessible, making it valuable for researchers who aim to improve their publishing skills.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Nama : Amalia Az-Zahra
    NIM : 231250030
    MPI 5A
    1. Logis :Is there insufficient literature on writing and publishing
    in scholarly journals? Well, quite the contrary in fact

    2. Clearity : Each of the 12 papers of
    the series is constructed as an easy-to-read one-pager, di-
    vided into background information (‘‘What you should
    know’’) and advice (‘‘What you should do’’).
    3. Formality: The nature of this series does not allow us to address
    all possible aspects of writing and publishing. For exam-
    ple, it does not provide specific information for papers re-
    porting on qualitative research

    ReplyDelete
  19. NAMA: SITI AMAS SAPINAH
    NIM: 231250013
    MPI 5A



    After reading this article, I think its content is both practical and highly relevant, especially for novice researchers who often struggle with writing their first papers. The authors highlight the importance of scientific writing as not only essential for knowledge dissemination but also crucial for career development.

    From the perspective of effectiveness in academic writing, the article demonstrates three key criteria:

    1. Logic
    The article is well-structured and logical. It begins by identifying a common problem—many researchers, even seniors, find writing difficult—then moves on to explain why this new series is being introduced, and finally outlines the benefits for readers. The inclusion of twelve clear topics (from getting started to responding to reviewers) gives the article a systematic flow that makes sense.

    2. Clarity
    Clarity is another strength. The language is straightforward and easy to follow. The authors explain that each paper in the series will be divided into “What you should know” and “What you should do,” which provides readers with direct and practical guidance. References to guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, and the EQUATOR Network also add precision and help readers find additional resources.

    3. Formality
    The article maintains an academic tone with references, citations, and acknowledgments, ensuring it meets formal standards. At the same time, the use of imperative style in the upcoming series (“Do this, avoid that”) gives it a more applied and reader-friendly touch without losing its academic credibility.

    Overall, I find this article effective because it balances logic, clarity, and formality while also being practical. It doesn’t just discuss theory but actually offers solutions and guidance that researchers can immediately apply.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Nama: Avilianti Pratiwi
    NIM: 231250032
    Kelas: MPI 5A

    Artikel ini memperkenalkan rangkaian tulisan tentang penulisan dan publikasi karya ilmiah yang efektif, khususnya ditujukan untuk peneliti pemula.
    - Dari sisi logika, artikel ini tersusun runtut: diawali dengan urgensi penulisan ilmiah, tantangan yang dihadapi peneliti, hingga solusi berupa seri panduan praktis. Alur argumentasinya konsisten dan mudah diikuti.
    - Dari segi kejelasan (clarity), bahasa yang digunakan sederhana, lugas, dan langsung pada inti. Penulis membedakan bagian “apa yang perlu diketahui” dan “apa yang perlu dilakukan”, sehingga memudahkan pembaca memahami serta menerapkan isi tulisan.
    - Dari aspek formalitas, gaya bahasa tetap akademis sesuai standar artikel ilmiah, lengkap dengan sitasi dan rujukan pada pedoman internasional seperti EQUATOR Network dan ICMJE. Struktur penulisan juga sesuai dengan norma akademik; ada pendahuluan, isi, dan referensi.
    Secara keseluruhan, artikel ini efektif karena mampu menyampaikan pesan utama dengan jelas, logis, dan tetap menjaga nuansa akademik yang formal.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Nama : Agis Maulana
    NIM : 231250003
    Kelas : MPI 5 A

    In my opinion, this article introduces a series of articles published periodically in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology to guide researchers, especially novice researchers, in writing and publishing scientific papers. The series covers twelve important topics, ranging from title and abstract development, methods, results, and discussion sections, to strategies for handling reviewer comments.
    The author emphasizes that publication success depends not only on theu quality of research content but also on the ability to communicate results clearly, concisely, and in accordance with academic standards. Furthermore, the article explains that despite the abundance of guidance and literature on scientific writing, many novice researchers still struggle to access practical information that can be immediately applied.

    ReplyDelete