Please open this link to analyse the article. Please give your ideas about its content including the criteria of effectiveness in academic writing (logic, clearity, and formality). Put the answers in this blog' comment column. Thank you
Please open this link to analyse the article. Please give your ideas about its content including the criteria of effectiveness in academic writing (logic, clearity, and formality). Put the answers in this blog' comment column. Thank you
Aulia khairunisa
ReplyDelete231250005
Mpi 5A
In my opinion, this article works well as an introduction because it not only explains the background but also makes the purpose of the series very clear. The logic is easy to follow since the authors describe why many researchers struggle with writing, and then show how the series will provide step-by-step guidance. I also find the clarity strong, especially when they divide the information into what readers should know and what they should do. It feels structured but not overwhelming. The formal style is kept in line with academic standards, yet the language is still accessible for readers who may not be very experienced. Overall, the article is effective because it combines logical flow, clarity, and a professional tone, which makes it both useful and enjoyable to read.
Nama: Awaliyah Nasuha
ReplyDeleteNIM: 231250031
Kelas: MPI - 5A
In my opinion
Logic:
The content of this article is highly relevant because it introduces a structured series aimed at improving the skills of novice and even senior researchers in writing and publishing scientific papers. In terms of logic, the article is well-organized, starting from the rationale for the series, moving to the problems faced by researchers, and concluding with the solutions offered through the series. It follows a clear cause-and-effect structure that strengthens the argument.
Clearity:
Regarding clearity, the writing is straightforward and avoids unnecessary jargon, making it accessible to a broad audience. The division of the upcoming series into specific topics (such as title, abstract, methods, results, and responding to reviewers) provides a transparent roadmap that will help readers easily understand the scope and purpose of the initiative.
Formality:
As for formality, the article maintains an academic tone by supporting its claims with references, acknowledging contributors, and citing established guidelines such as CONSORT and STROBE. This enhances its credibility and positions it within the scholarly tradition of evidence-based recommendations.
Overall, the article is effective because it balances informative content with a professional style, making it both practical and academically sound.
Nama : Lira Awanda
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250009
Kelas : MPI 5 A
This article, titled "Introducing a new series on effective scientific writing and publishing," introduces a series of articles discussing tips for writing and publishing scientific papers effectively. It is primarily aimed at novice researchers, although it is also relevant to experienced researchers. Its primary focus is on providing practical guidance on how to write, from the first draft to dealing with reviewers' comments.
1. Logic
This article can be considered logical because its content is structured coherently and is easy to follow. The author begins by explaining the importance of scientific publications, then outlines problems often faced by novice researchers, such as writing difficulties and a lack of systematic direction. After that, the article offers a solution in the form of a monthly series with 12 main topics that discuss the steps of scientific writing, from "How to get started" to "Responding to reviewers." Finally, the author also addresses the limitations of this series, for example, it does not specifically discuss qualitative research or detailed grammar, before concluding with the ultimate goal: to help researchers write more effectively. This flow demonstrates a clear logic of problem, solution, implementation, limitations, and goals.
2. Clarity
This article is considered clear because it is presented clearly and concisely. The author uses a format that makes it easy for readers to navigate, dividing each topic into two sections: "What you should know" and "What you should do." This structure helps readers understand the difference between background information and practical advice. Furthermore, each article in the series includes a short checklist summarizing the main points, making the content easier to understand, especially for novice researchers. Clarity is also evident in the table detailing the 12 main topics, giving readers a clear understanding of the scope of the material covered in this series.
3. Formality
This article can be considered formal because it is written in an academic style appropriate for a scientific journal. This is evident in the use of neutral and professional language, the mention of scientific references (e.g., Guyatt & Haynes, Knottnerus & Tugwell), and the inclusion of an official DOI. The author also includes acknowledgments to various parties and a bibliography that adheres to international academic standards. Furthermore, the article uses formal terms such as "variables in the writing process determine whether a paper will be accepted," demonstrating objectivity and academic seriousness. All of these elements confirm that the article was written with a high level of formality, in accordance with scientific writing criteria.
Siti Nurul Mafudoh
ReplyDelete231250027
Mpi 5A
In my opinion, the content of this article is quite good because it provides a clear overview of the importance of scientific writing skills and how this series of tips can help researchers, especially beginners. In terms of academic writing effectiveness, the article meets the following criteria: Logic → The flow is coherent, starting from the reason for this series, the problems the author frequently encounters, to the explanation of the content of each topic. This makes it easy for readers to follow. Clarity → The language used is clear and to the point, for example, with the "What you should know" and "What you should do" sections. This makes it easy for readers to understand. Formality → The language style remains formal according to scientific journal standards, but remains communicative. It's not too stiff, so it can be enjoyed by both beginners and experienced researchers. In short, this article is effective because it's not only informative but also practical and can be directly used by readers in their scientific writing activities.
Nama = Chika Syahfitri
ReplyDeleteNIM = 231250025
Kelas = 5 MPI A
Menurut saya, artikel ini cukup berhasil sebagai pengantar (Introduction) karena tidak hanya memberikan gambaran awal, tetapi juga menegaskan tujuan dari seri yang akan dibahas. Alurnya juga terasa logis, dimulai dari penjelasan tantangan yang dihadapi peneliti dalam menulis hingga tawaran solusi berupa panduan sistematis. Dari sisi kejelasan, penulis juga menyajikan informasi dengan membedakan antara hal yang perlu dipahami pembaca dan langkah yang harus dilakukan, sehingga terasa mudah diikuti tanpa terasa rumit. Sementara itu, unsur formalitas juga tetap terjaga karena menggunakan gaya akademik yang profesional, namun bahasanya tetap ramah bagi peneliti pemula. menurut saya Keseluruhan tulisan ini juga efektif karena mampu memadukan logika yang runtut, penyampaian yang jelas, serta sikap formal yang sesuai dengan standar publikasi ilmiah.
Menurut saya ini ialah beberapa kalimat yg bersifat logis dari artikel diatas :
“Writing and publishing scientific papers is the core business of every researcher.”
“Good scientific content of a paper alone does not guarantee its publication in a good journal.”
“Anticipation and modification of such determinants will increase an author’s effectiveness, enabling them to get more done in less time; offering editors, reviewers, and readers a clear storyline; increasing enjoyment and reducing frustration; and raising the likelihood of having a paper accepted by a good journal.”
“It is perhaps not only the abundance of information but also its sometimes nonspecific nature, which prevents young researchers from getting a clear overview of ways to effectively write and publish a biomedical research paper.”
Menurut saya ini ialah beberapa kalimat yg bersifat Kejelasan ( clarity) dari artikel diatas :
“Effective scientific writing, however, is not easy.”
“Each of the 12 papers of the series is constructed as an easy-to-read one-pager, divided into background information (‘What you should know’) and advice (‘What you should do’).”
“It is not a specific guide to successful publishing in JCE; its content applies to writing biomedical research papers in general.”
“We hope that you will enjoy reading the series and that it will increase your pleasure in writing and the acceptance rate of your papers.”
Menurut saya ini ialah beberapa kalimat yg bersifat Formal dari artikel diatas :
“This article introduces a series of writing tips that will appear each month in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (JCE) over the next year.”
“The primary target audience are novice academic researchers, although the series may also be useful for senior researchers who supervise less experienced colleagues.”
“An exhaustive list of available guidelines and other resources to facilitate good research reporting is provided by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research) network.”
“This new series of monthly writing tips builds on the existing literature about research reporting in JCE.”
“The series was written to offer tips and tricks for clear and concise writing and publishing and to support authors in getting their message across to the scientific community.”
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteNama : Fariha Bintang Cahyani
ReplyDeleteNim : 231250018
Kelas : MPI 5A
The article Introducing a new series on effective writing and publishing of scientific papers emphasizes the importance of effective academic writing and introduces a series of practical tips to support researchers. It fulfills three main criteria of effective academic writing: logic, clarity, and formality.
In terms of logic, the article is coherent and well-structured. It begins by highlighting the central role of writing in research, discusses common difficulties faced by both junior and senior researchers, and then offers a solution through a series of concise writing guides.
From the standpoint of clarity, the language is straightforward and the series is divided into two key parts: “what you should know” and “what you should do.” This format ensures that readers receive both context and actionable advice, making it easier for novice researchers to apply.
Regarding formality, the article maintains an appropriate academic tone, supported by references, guidelines, and citations. Although the advice uses the imperative style, it suits the practical purpose.
Overall, the article is effective, balancing logical structure, clarity, and scholarly formality.
Nama: Ines Munajah
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250016
Kelas : MPI 5 A
In my opinion, this article is effective in achieving its purpose as an introduction to a writing series for novice researchers. It successfully explains the problem, the rationale for creating the series, and the scope of what will be covered, while also offering useful context for readers. The writing is informative and easy to follow, making it valuable not only for beginners but also for more experienced academics who need a refresher.
Logic
In terms of logic, the article is well organized and coherent. It starts with the challenges faced by researchers in writing scientific papers, then highlights the insufficiency of existing resources, and finally presents the new series as a practical solution. The argument flows naturally from problem to solution, supported by relevant references and examples, which strengthens the credibility of the content.
Clarity
Regarding clarity, the article communicates its ideas in a straightforward and understandable manner. The language used is simple enough for the target audience, and the inclusion of a table listing the topics of the series helps readers grasp the scope quickly. Although there are a few long sentences with many references that may feel dense, the main message remains clear and accessible.
Formality
As for formality, the tone is appropriately academic and professional, suitable for publication in a scholarly journal. The authors make use of references, acknowledgments, and established guidelines, which enhance the article’s credibility. At the same time, the style avoids being overly rigid, using expressions such as “do’s and don’ts” to keep the text engaging without losing its scholarly character.
HIKMAH ISLAMIYATI
ReplyDeleteNIM. 231250011
MPI 5A
In my opinion, this article meets the criteria for effective academic writing, particularly in terms of logic, clarity, and formality. 1. Logic In my opinion, this article has a logical and well-organized structure. It begins with: - Introduction to the problem (this article states that scientific writing and publishing are important, but often difficult for many researchers. It also mentions that existing guidance is sometimes suboptimal), - Solution (this article provides concise and practical guidance on writing articles). - Benefits (this article helps authors become more effective, reduces frustration, and increases the likelihood of their papers being accepted into journals). - Content and format (provides a detailed overview, from writing the first draft to responding to reviewer comments, and proper formatting of each article). 2. Clarity This article is written very clearly and directly to the point, without being convoluted. This article uses clear and easy-to-understand language. The format is also clear, allowing readers to quickly grasp the content. 3. Formality Although this article is only an introduction and provides suggestions, its formality is maintained in accordance with article writing standards.
Nama: Tuti Musaropah
ReplyDeleteNim: 231250004
Prodi: MPI 5 A
This article is highly relevant and beneficial for the academic community, particularly novice researchers who often encounter difficulties in writing and publishing scientific articles. The emphasis that writing scientific articles is not merely about presenting research content, but also about mastering the skill of structuring a clear, systematic, and communicative line of thought, is an important point that is often overlooked.
The effort to present a series of short articles in a practical format consisting of background, recommendations, and checklists reflects an applicable and solution-oriented approach. This provides not only theoretical insight but also concrete guidance that authors can directly apply.
In addition, the provision of open access is a strategic step that supports the democratization of knowledge, especially for researchers in low- and middle-income countries who often face resource constraints. With open access, barriers such as cost and limited literature can be reduced, thereby creating more equitable opportunities to contribute to scientific discourse.
Thus, this article not only fills a gap in the literature, which has often been too general or theoretical, but also offers practical guidance that has the potential to improve the quality of scientific publications globally. Furthermore, this article can serve as both an inspiration and an important reference in the effort to build a stronger, more inclusive, and more competitive writing culture in the international academic world.
Nama : Siti Khoriyah
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250008
Kelas : MPI 5A
This article discusses the importance of effective scientific writing skills, especially for novice researchers. Its purpose is to provide practical guidance from drafting the first version of a paper to responding to reviewers’ comments. The series consists of 12 main topics such as how to get started, writing the abstract, methods, results, discussion, submitting a manuscript, and responding to reviewers.
In my opinion, this article is very useful because it emphasizes that good scientific content alone is not enough to be published in a reputable journal. Authors also need to master clear, logical, and well-structured writing strategies so that their research message is understandable and convincing for both reviewers and readers.
Criteria of Effectiveness in Academic Writing
- Logic
The article presents a coherent flow: from the urgency of scientific writing, challenges faced by young researchers, to the solution in the form of a writing series. Each argument is supported with references and reasonable explanations, making it easy to follow the logic.
- Clarity
The language used is straightforward, concise, and avoids unnecessary complexity. The article also includes Table 1 summarizing the topics, which helps readers grasp both the big picture and the details more easily.
- Formality
The article is written in a formal academic style. Word choices are precise, informal expressions are avoided, and every claim is supported with proper references. This reflects the professional standards of scientific publication.
Nama : Aep Saefullah
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250029
Kelas : MPI 5 A
Logika :
Penulisan akademis harus mengikuti alur pemikiran yang logis. Dalam dokumen ini, penulis menyusun ide dengan baik, mulai dari pengenalan tantangan yang dihadapi peneliti hingga solusi yang ditawarkan melalui serangkaian tips. Struktur yang jelas membantu pembaca mengikuti argumen yang disampaikan.
Kejelasan :
Kejelasannya adalah kunci dalam menyampaikan informasi ilmiah. Dokumen ini berusaha menyajikan informasi dalam format yang mudah dibaca dan dipahami, dengan pembagian yang jelas antara informasi latar belakang dan saran praktis. Ini sangat bermanfaat bagi penulis pemula yang memerlukan panduan langsung.
Formalitas :
Penulisan akademis umumnya mengharuskan penggunaan bahasa formal. Meskipun dokumen ini berusaha memberikan saran dalam bentuk imperatif—yang mungkin tidak biasa dalam konteks akademis—pendekatan ini dapat meningkatkan pemahaman dan pedoman penerapan yang diberikan. Namun, penting untuk tetap menjaga kesopanan dan profesionalisme dalam ekosistem.
Nama : Erika Ulan Dari
ReplyDeleteNIM :231250001
Kelas: MPI 5A
Menurut saya:
Logika:
Isi artikel ini sangat relevan karena menyajikan sebuah seri yang terstruktur untuk membantu meningkatkan kemampuan penulisan dan publikasi ilmiah, baik bagi peneliti pemula maupun yang sudah berpengalaman. Secara logis, artikel ini disusun dengan baik — dimulai dari alasan di balik dibuatnya seri ini, dilanjutkan dengan pemaparan permasalahan yang dihadapi oleh para peneliti, dan diakhiri dengan solusi yang ditawarkan melalui seri tersebut. Artikel ini menggunakan pola sebab-akibat yang jelas, sehingga memperkuat argumen yang disampaikan.
Kejelasan:
Dari segi kejelasan, tulisan ini disampaikan secara lugas dan menghindari penggunaan istilah teknis yang tidak perlu, sehingga dapat dipahami oleh khalayak luas. Pembagian seri yang akan datang ke dalam topik-topik khusus (seperti judul, abstrak, metode, hasil, dan tanggapan terhadap reviewer) memberikan gambaran yang jelas, sehingga memudahkan pembaca dalam memahami cakupan dan tujuan dari inisiatif ini.
Tingkat Formalitas:
Dari segi formalitas, artikel ini mempertahankan nada akademik dengan menyertakan referensi yang mendukung pernyataan, mengakui kontribusi pihak terkait, serta mengutip pedoman yang telah diakui seperti CONSORT dan STROBE. Hal ini meningkatkan kredibilitas tulisan dan menempatkannya dalam tradisi ilmiah yang berlandaskan pada rekomendasi berbasis bukti.
Secara keseluruhan, artikel ini efektif karena mampu menyeimbangkan antara isi yang informatif dan gaya penulisan profesional, sehingga bersifat praktis sekaligus memiliki landasan akademik yang kuat.
Nama : Muhamad Fadil Idris
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250006
Kelas : MPI 5A
I think the content of this article is very effective in conveying its message, such as:
Logic: The authors of this article have a very strong reason for creating a series of writing tips. According to the article, writing scientific papers is difficult, even for experienced researchers. While many books and guides are available, they are often too general and don't immediately provide a clear picture of what to do. Therefore, they created a new series that is more practical, direct, and to the point to help young researchers. Furthermore, the language in the article is easy to understand.
Clarity: The text of this article is very clear. The authors immediately make it clear that their target audience is novice researchers, but this series can also be useful for experienced researchers who are mentoring others. They also mention that each article will be divided into two parts: "What you need to know" and "What you should do," and include a checklist in each article. This clarity makes readers immediately know what they will get from this series.
Formality: Although this article is academic, it is not stuffy. The authors use relatively straightforward and to-the-point language. They even employ a slightly personal tone, for example, when they recount their own experiences starting their writing careers and reviewing other people's manuscripts as members of the editorial board. This makes the article feel more honest and relevant. Despite this, the structure and content remain professional, complete with references to support their claims. Ultimately, the article successfully blends the required formality with a friendly and accessible tone.
Nama : Faizatun Nisa Al-Karimah
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250019
Kelas : MPI 5A
The article introduces a new series on effective writing and publishing of scientific papers, targeting novice academic researchers but also beneficial to senior researchers. It emphasizes how successful scientific writing is crucial for researchers’ careers and advancing knowledge, yet many struggle due to lack of structured guidance. The series aims to provide concise, practical advice covering the entire writing and publishing process, improving clarity, completeness, and transparency, supported by well-established guidelines.
#Analysis of Content
The article is well-structured, starting with the rationale for the series, the typical challenges faced by researchers, and the practical solution offered. It acknowledges existing literature but identifies the need for more accessible, experience-based tips. The clear breakdown of topics to be covered (e.g., how to start, title, methods, results, responding to reviewers) shows comprehensive coverage of the writing process.
#Effectiveness Criteria
* Logic : The article is logically organized, presenting the problem (difficulty in scientific writing), the gap (existing guidelines are too broad or nonspecific), and the proposed solution (a focused series of tips). It uses a stepwise flow, which guides the reader from problem identification to practical help.
* Clarity : The language is clear and straightforward, avoiding unnecessary jargon. The authors explain why the series is needed and how it complements existing guidelines. The use of short, focused papers with checklists enhances user-friendliness and clarity for readers.
* Formality : The tone is formally appropriate for an academic journal. It uses professional language and references authoritative sources. The imperative tone for advice sections, though unusual for the journal, appropriately fits the instructional purpose.
#Conclusion
Overall, the article is an effective piece of academic writing. It balances formality with accessibility and is logical and clear in presenting the need for better scientific writing support. The series itself promises to enhance researchers’ abilities to write and publish more successfully, providing structured, practical guidance in a user-friendly format.
Aulia Novi Santoso
ReplyDelete231250033
MPI 5A
This article, "Introducing a new series on effective writing and publishing of scientific papers," serves as an introduction to a forthcoming 12-part series in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (JCE). The series is designed to help novice academic researchers and even senior researchers improve their skills in writing and publishing scientific papers.
Critique of the Article's Effectiveness
From a rhetorical and academic standpoint, the article is effective because it clearly outlines a problem and presents a well-structured solution.
Logika dan Kejelasan (Logic and Clarity)
- Problem Identification: The authors logically begin by establishing the problem: effective scientific writing is difficult, and existing resources are often too abundant and non-specific for young researchers.
- Proposed Solution: They then introduce the new series as a targeted solution. They specify that the series will be composed of 12 concise, easy-to-read, one-page papers that provide "clear and concise key information".
- Structure and Content: The article clearly lists the topics the series will cover, ranging from "How to get started" to "Responding to reviewers," demonstrating a comprehensive and logical progression through the publishing process. The format of each paper, with sections for "What you should know" and "What you should do," is also a clear and practical approach.
Formalitas (Formality)
The article maintains an appropriate academic tone while being accessible to its target audience. It is formal in its structure and language but avoids being overly stiff. For example, the authors mention that the series will use the imperative ("What you should do"), which is "unusual in JCE" but fits the series' goal of providing direct, experience-based advice. This choice demonstrates a thoughtful balance between scholarly formality and practical utility. The inclusion of an acknowledgment section and a reference list adheres to standard academic publishing conventions.
Overall, the article effectively communicates its message by outlining a clear problem and a pragmatic solution. It successfully introduces a new resource and justifies its value, adhering to the very principles of effective communication it intends to teach.
Nama : Iin Anisah
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250007
Kelas : MPI - 5A
In my opinion, the article is interesting because it introduces a series of guidelines designed to help researchers improve their skills in writing and publishing scientific papers more effectively. The series covers essential topics throughout the writing process, from drafting the first manuscript to responding to reviewers’ comments. With a simple yet systematic approach, the article addresses the real needs of researchers, especially beginners in the academic field.
Logic:
From a logical perspective, the article is arranged in a well-structured order. It first emphasizes the importance of scientific writing, then explains the challenges commonly faced by researchers, and finally offers a solution through the proposed series of short papers. This cause-and-effect pattern strengthens the argument and makes it easier for readers to understand both the rationale and the benefits of the initiative.
Clarity:
In terms of clarity, the article uses accessible language that avoids unnecessary technical jargon, making it easy for a wide audience to follow. The inclusion of a list of topics, such as titles, abstracts, methods, results, and responding to reviewers, provides a clear overview of the series. This organization allows readers to quickly grasp the scope and purpose of the program.
Formality:
Regarding formality, the article maintains an academic tone by citing references, acknowledging contributions, and referring to internationally recognized guidelines. The style of writing reflects academic seriousness while remaining approachable for novice researchers. This balance between formal tone and practical delivery makes the article professional and relevant at the same time.
Overall, the article is effective because it presents relevant, logical, and clear information while upholding academic formality. It not only introduces a helpful series of writing tips but also shows how academic communication can be professional yet accessible, making it valuable for researchers who aim to improve their publishing skills.
Nama : Amalia Az-Zahra
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250030
MPI 5A
1. Logis :Is there insufficient literature on writing and publishing
in scholarly journals? Well, quite the contrary in fact
2. Clearity : Each of the 12 papers of
the series is constructed as an easy-to-read one-pager, di-
vided into background information (‘‘What you should
know’’) and advice (‘‘What you should do’’).
3. Formality: The nature of this series does not allow us to address
all possible aspects of writing and publishing. For exam-
ple, it does not provide specific information for papers re-
porting on qualitative research
NAMA: SITI AMAS SAPINAH
ReplyDeleteNIM: 231250013
MPI 5A
After reading this article, I think its content is both practical and highly relevant, especially for novice researchers who often struggle with writing their first papers. The authors highlight the importance of scientific writing as not only essential for knowledge dissemination but also crucial for career development.
From the perspective of effectiveness in academic writing, the article demonstrates three key criteria:
1. Logic
The article is well-structured and logical. It begins by identifying a common problem—many researchers, even seniors, find writing difficult—then moves on to explain why this new series is being introduced, and finally outlines the benefits for readers. The inclusion of twelve clear topics (from getting started to responding to reviewers) gives the article a systematic flow that makes sense.
2. Clarity
Clarity is another strength. The language is straightforward and easy to follow. The authors explain that each paper in the series will be divided into “What you should know” and “What you should do,” which provides readers with direct and practical guidance. References to guidelines such as CONSORT, STROBE, and the EQUATOR Network also add precision and help readers find additional resources.
3. Formality
The article maintains an academic tone with references, citations, and acknowledgments, ensuring it meets formal standards. At the same time, the use of imperative style in the upcoming series (“Do this, avoid that”) gives it a more applied and reader-friendly touch without losing its academic credibility.
Overall, I find this article effective because it balances logic, clarity, and formality while also being practical. It doesn’t just discuss theory but actually offers solutions and guidance that researchers can immediately apply.
Nama: Avilianti Pratiwi
ReplyDeleteNIM: 231250032
Kelas: MPI 5A
Artikel ini memperkenalkan rangkaian tulisan tentang penulisan dan publikasi karya ilmiah yang efektif, khususnya ditujukan untuk peneliti pemula.
- Dari sisi logika, artikel ini tersusun runtut: diawali dengan urgensi penulisan ilmiah, tantangan yang dihadapi peneliti, hingga solusi berupa seri panduan praktis. Alur argumentasinya konsisten dan mudah diikuti.
- Dari segi kejelasan (clarity), bahasa yang digunakan sederhana, lugas, dan langsung pada inti. Penulis membedakan bagian “apa yang perlu diketahui” dan “apa yang perlu dilakukan”, sehingga memudahkan pembaca memahami serta menerapkan isi tulisan.
- Dari aspek formalitas, gaya bahasa tetap akademis sesuai standar artikel ilmiah, lengkap dengan sitasi dan rujukan pada pedoman internasional seperti EQUATOR Network dan ICMJE. Struktur penulisan juga sesuai dengan norma akademik; ada pendahuluan, isi, dan referensi.
Secara keseluruhan, artikel ini efektif karena mampu menyampaikan pesan utama dengan jelas, logis, dan tetap menjaga nuansa akademik yang formal.
Nama : Agis Maulana
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250003
Kelas : MPI 5 A
In my opinion, this article introduces a series of articles published periodically in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology to guide researchers, especially novice researchers, in writing and publishing scientific papers. The series covers twelve important topics, ranging from title and abstract development, methods, results, and discussion sections, to strategies for handling reviewer comments.
The author emphasizes that publication success depends not only on theu quality of research content but also on the ability to communicate results clearly, concisely, and in accordance with academic standards. Furthermore, the article explains that despite the abundance of guidance and literature on scientific writing, many novice researchers still struggle to access practical information that can be immediately applied.
Nama : Muhamad Qulyuby
ReplyDeleteNIM : 231250022
KELAS : MPI 5 A
In my opinion.
1. Logic
This article is structured with a systematic and coherent flow of thought. The opening section explains the purpose of the article, which is to introduce a new series of articles containing guidelines for writing and publishing scientific papers. This is followed by a background to the problem: many researchers, including senior researchers, still experience difficulties in writing scientific papers effectively. The author then offers a concrete solution, namely a series of articles covering 12 important topics in the academic writing process. Finally, the article emphasizes the purpose and practical benefits of the series for researchers in various countries.
2. Clarity
The article's content is written in a clear, concise, and informative academic style. The author uses direct sentences with a structure that is easy for academic readers to follow. Each paragraph has a single, focused main idea, so readers can follow the argument easily. The article also includes tables (Table 1) that clarify the content of the series of articles, helping readers understand the scope of the topic without having to read extensively.
3. Formality
This article uses a formal and objective academic style, in accordance with international scientific journal standards. The language used is neutral and informative, without personal opinions or emotional expressions. The author uses an impersonal structure and sometimes the passive voice, typical of academic writing. Scientific sources are cited fully and consistently, demonstrating adherence to academic conventions and scientific ethics. Although introductory, this article adheres to the journal's structure: a brief abstract, main body, acknowledgments, and bibliography.
Nama: Rossalia Putri
ReplyDeleteNIM: 231250099
Kelas: MPI 5c
INTRODUCTION
Vocational students as youths have always been regarded as an asset to the social group by family, tribe or state. All students' programs are not well organized, so they need to be properly organized and trained for a specific job. Pramesti and Susanto (2023) also mentioned that Vocational schools itself are educational institutions that provide practical skills and training for specific occupations such as technology, healthcare, business, and industry. They seek to provide students with the knowledge and abilities required to enter the workforce after completing their education, with an emphasis on job-specific skills and career routes. On the flip side, their job performance relies on having the required manipulative skill, adequate
technical knowledge, and the intelligence to apply that knowledge to the job's challenges (Lubis, Yudistira, & Saputra, 2025). A vocational school is a secondary education institution
that teaches students particular skills and knowledge for various job kinds. These schools emphasize practical training and technical education, preparing students for professions in automotive, construction, engineering, and healthcare (Niswah et al., 2024). English classes in vocational schools face a significant challenge due to the imbalance between curriculum material and instructional time.
RESEARCH FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION
Students’ Level Communicative Competence and Students’ Need
The First research objective is to find out the students’ level communicative competence
and their need in English subject. Researchers conducted observation and structured interviews
with sixty vocational school students in Tangerang City. etc...
Based on the table of Hughes levels and fields of research that measures teacher
competence and students' language ability above, it can be seen that the graph chart illustrates
Hughes' levels and fields of research observed during the study on vocational students' English
communicative competence. The chart displays a range of levels from 2.6 to 2.85, each
corresponding to specific fields of research such as psycho and socio linguistics, pragmatics,
kinesics, discourse, and conversational analysis.etc...
Discussion
Based on the findings of the study, the discussion on the English communicative
competence of Indonesian vocational students reveals a nuanced portrait of challenges and gaps
that require urgent pedagogical and curricular attention. The data gathered from observations,
interviews, and document analysis collectively point to a disconnect between the expected
communicative outcomes outlined in national educational goals and the actual skills possessed
by vocational school students. While students demonstrate moderate to strong performance in
grammatical structure and language mechanics, their competence in essential communicative
domains—such as vocabulary usage, phonology, discourse analysis, and especially applied
communication in workplace scenarios—remains underdeveloped. The findings are in line with
Suwartono et al. (2024) who inform that while technical aspects of language, such as structure
and grammar, have been relatively well addressed, the implementation of communicative
practices that bridge classroom instruction with real-world industrial needs remains inadequate. etc...
CONCLUSION
The study on Indonesian vocational students' English communicative competence
highlights a significant gap between desired English skills and actual competencies. Factors
contributing to this discrepancy include teachers' commitment, students' diverse competencies,
and school facilities. To improve students' communicative abilities, the study recommends
teachers to be committed to syllabus development, align teaching methods with students' needs,
and adopt student-cantered approaches. Regular supervision and evaluation by program heads
are also crucial. Collaborative efforts, can promote consistency and quality in vocational
education. etc...
Nama : Siti raudatul janah
ReplyDeleteNim : 231250071
Kelas : MPI 5C
The article provides a clear and well-structured introduction to a series on effective scientific writing and publishing. Its content is informative, outlining the challenges many researchers especially beginners face when preparing manuscripts, and explaining why a concise, experience-based set of guidelines is needed despite the abundance of existing literature. In terms of academic writing quality, the text demonstrates strong logical organization, beginning with the problem, presenting relevant context, and offering the proposed solution in the form of a monthly series. The clarity is excellent, supported by concise language, straightforward explanations, and a helpful overview of the twelve topics covered in the series. The level of formality is appropriate for an academic journal: the tone is objective, supported by citations, and maintains professionalism while remaining accessible to novice researchers. Overall, the article meets the key criteria of effective academic writing logical coherence, clarity of presentation, and consistent formal tone making it a strong and purposeful introductory piece.
Rossalia Putri
ReplyDelete231250099
MPI 5c
Some ideas are repeated, such as the discussion about the difficulties faced by novice researchers. Several topic transitions also feel less smooth. The writing style is fairly formal and appropriate for an academic journal.
Including sources and guidelines strengthens its academic tone, but a few expressions are too informal for scholarly writing, such as “tips and tricks” or “good news.” Certain parts also sound somewhat conversational.
Overall, the text is good in terms of logic, clarity, and formality. However, it still needs to avoid repetition, shorten lengthy sentences, improve transitions, and choose more formal wording.
Fia Ahfiatul Muhibah
ReplyDelete231250068
MPI 5C
The article is structured with a clear and logical flow, beginning with the urgency of mastering scientific writing, followed by common challenges faced by researchers, and concluding with an explanation of the purpose and scope of the guidance series. Its clarity is evident through systematic presentation, accessible language, and a strong emphasis on the series’ benefits for both novice and experienced researchers. In terms of formality, the writing maintains a consistent academic tone that is objective and aligned with scholarly standards. Overall, the article is effective in providing a comprehensive overview of the importance of scientific writing skills and how the series can help improve the quality of researchers’ publications.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeletePutri Salsabila Andriani
ReplyDelete231250093
MPI 5C
In my opinion, this article is clear, concise, and effectively explains the purpose of creating a writing guideline series aimed at meeting journal standards. For that reason, the series is presented as a practical solution to help improve scientific writing skills.
In terms of logic, the article is well-structured. The main ideas are presented in order—starting from the importance of writing scientific articles, the common problems encountered, and finally the reason behind developing the guideline series. The flow of thought is easy to follow and does not jump between topics.
From the clarity aspect, the language used is simple and straight to the point. The explanation of the series’ contents is brief, including a table of topics that allows readers to quickly understand the structure of the guideline.
In terms of formality, the article uses academic language that aligns with international journal standards. The author avoids informal expressions and includes relevant references to support each argument.
In conclusion, this article is effective as an introduction. The message is delivered clearly, the structure is logical, and the writing style remains formal. The article also demonstrates the practical benefits of the guideline series for scientific writers, both beginners and experienced ones.
Yuni Oktavia
ReplyDelete231250084
MPI 5 C
1. Overall Ideas About the Article
The article discusses a training program introducing English teachers in Serang, Banten, to the use of Virtual Writing Tutor (VWT) as an AI-based tool to improve scientific writing skills. It emphasizes the role of ICT in the Merdeka Curriculum, the need for digital literacy among teachers, and reports positive outcomes after the training through pre-test and post-test results. The findings show strong enthusiasm from participants and highlight gaps in ICT implementation in actual classroom practice.
2. Evaluation of Academic Writing Effectiveness
A. Logic (Coherence & Argument Flow)
-The article presents a logical sequence: introduction → problem background → training method → results → conclusion.
-Arguments are supported by references to ICT development and curriculum requirements.
B. Clarity (Readability & Precision)
-The ideas are stated clearly, with explanations of ICT, VWT, and the training steps.
-Visual graphs help clarify findings.
C. Formality (Academic Tone & Style)
-The article uses appropriate academic language: formal vocabulary, objective tone, and reference to scholarly sources.
-Citations follow Indonesian academic writing standards.
3. Final Comment
The article succeeds in demonstrating the importance of AI-based tools such as VWT for enhancing teachers’ writing skills and supporting the Merdeka Curriculum. It is logically structured, mostly clear, and maintains an appropriate academic tone. The study could be strengthened by adding more detailed quantitative analysis, but overall, it contributes meaningful insight into ICT integration in teacher professional development.
Ila Deliyana
ReplyDelete231250074
MPI 5C
Evaluation Using Academic Writing Effectiveness Criteria
1. Logic / Logical Organization
Strengths
The article follows a logical flow:
A. Introduces the problem (difficulty writing scientific papers).
B. Provides background (existing guidance is abundant but overwhelming).
C. Presents the solution (a structured series of writing tips).
D. Explains the structure of the series (12 one-page papers, checklists, sections).
E. Mentions limitations (e.g., not covering qualitative writing in depth).
F. Ends with purpose and expected benefits.
The explanation of why the series is needed is backed by:
1. Authors’ own experiences
2. Observations from reviewing journal submissions
3. Literature showing the importance of clear writing
Weaknesses
1. Some transitions could be smoother—for example, when moving from general literature to the EQUATOR network resources.
2. The section on limitations could be placed closer to the end to avoid breaking the flow.
Verdict:
Very strong logical structure; arguments are coherent and well-supported.
2. Clarity
Strengths
A. The writing is clear, concise, and direct.
B. Sentences avoid unnecessary complexity.
C. Key points (e.g., purpose, structure of the series, target audience) are easy to identify.
D. The article uses plain language, making it accessible even to early-career researchers.
Examples of clarity:
1. The distinction between “What you should know” and “What you should do” is clearly explained.
2. The rationale for the series is described in straightforward terms.
Weaknesses
1. Some sentences are long and contain multiple ideas, which may challenge non-native readers.
2. The article assumes readers already understand the importance of reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE), which may not be true for beginners.
Verdict:
High clarity; information is easy to understand with minimal ambiguity.
3. Formality
Strengths
A. The article uses a high level of academic formality, appropriate for a scientific journal.
B. Tone is objective, informative, and professional.
C. Vocabulary is scholarly but not overly technical.
D. Citations and references follow academic conventions.
Examples of strong formality:
1. Use of objective phrasing (“Various factors impact writing and publishing…”).
2. Formal reference and acknowledgement sections.
Weaknesses
A few informal expressions (“piles of textbooks”) introduce a conversational tone, though they are used to increase readability.
Verdict:
Appropriate academic formality with slight conversational elements for accessibility.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAlvi hasanah
ReplyDelete231250094
MPI 5C
1. Logic
The article shows strong logical organization. It begins by explaining the purpose of the new writing-tip series and the problems that many novice researchers face. After that, it logically describes the structure and content of the 12-paper series, explaining why each part is necessary. The authors also compare existing writing guidelines with the new series to justify its importance. The ideas flow smoothly from the background, to the explanation, to the expected benefits for readers. This makes the article easy to follow and logically coherent.
2. Clarity
The article is written very clearly. The authors use straightforward language to explain the purpose of the series and avoid overly complex sentences. They clearly list the topics covered in the series and describe how each monthly paper will be presented. They also clearly explain the target audience, the expected outcomes, and the limitations of the series. The use of short descriptions, simple explanations, and a table helps readers understand the content without confusion. Overall, the clarity makes the article accessible even for new researchers.
3. Formality
The article maintains an appropriate academic tone throughout. The writing style is formal, objective, and polite, as expected from a scientific journal. It avoids slang, personal opinions, or emotional expressions. Citations are used properly, and references support the claims made by the authors. The language is professional and follows academic conventions. Although the tone is formal, it is still friendly and encouraging for readers, especially novice researchers.
Overall Evaluation
The article is effective in academic writing because it is logical, clear, and formal. It communicates its purpose well, explains its content in an organized manner, and maintains a professional tone. This makes it a strong example of good academic writing and a helpful introduction to the writing-tip series.
ReplyDeleteComment: Analysis of the Article
1. Content Overview
The article introduces a 12-part series published in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology designed to help novice and experienced researchers improve their scientific writing and publishing skills. It explains:
• The importance of effective scientific writing
• Common difficulties faced by researchers
• The gap between available guidelines and practical writing needs
• How the new series aims to provide concise, actionable tips (“What you should know” and “What you should do”)
• The target audience: mainly early-career researchers
• The usefulness of the series for improving clarity, transparency, and efficiency in research reporting
Overall, the article serves as a meta-guide, preparing readers for a structured set of upcoming writing tips.
2. Logic (Organization & Coherence)
The article follows a clear, logical structure:
• It starts with the background problem (why researchers struggle with writing).
• It continues with the rationale for creating the series.
• It provides supporting evidence (existing literature, experience of authors, large number of guidelines).
• Then it describes the content and format of the series.
• It ends with limitations and concluding remarks.
Each paragraph flows naturally into the next. The sequence is coherent: problem → need → solution → expectations.
This demonstrates strong academic logic.
3. Clarity (Language, Readability, Purpose)
The writing is very clear, characterized by:
• Straightforward sentences
• Direct explanation of aims and audience
• Clear transitions (e.g., “however,” “various factors impact…,” “this new series…”)
• Use of examples and references
The authors avoid ambiguity. Key terms—such as “effective writing,” “guidelines,” and “novice researchers”—are explained or contextualized.
The purpose of the article is easily understood: to introduce and justify the upcoming writing series.
4. Formality (Tone, Style, Academic Standards)
The tone is appropriately formal:
• No informal expressions
• Professional and neutral vocabulary
• References are properly cited
• Objective and informative tone
• Use of passive voice where needed (“is constructed,” “is published as open access”)
The structure meets expectations for academic writing in a reputable journal.
The authors maintain a respectful tone and follow conventional academic standards.
5. Final Evaluation
Overall, the article meets the criteria of effective academic writing:
• Logical in structure and argumentation
• Clear in purpose, explanations, and organization
• Formal in tone, style, and citation practice
It successfully functions as an introductory article that sets context for a professional writing series.
Rahma alia
ReplyDelete231250073
MPI C/ 5
Here is the English translation of your commentary on the scientific writing tips series:
Core Value: This article serves as an eye-opener for researchers, especially junior researchers, regarding the high standards expected in scientific publication.
* Focus on Quality: The author explicitly states that effective and concise writing ability is crucial, even more important than a brilliant research design, for a manuscript to be accepted by a journal.
* Holistic Coverage: The proposed tips series covers the entire research process, ranging from the basic structure of a paper (Introduction, Methods, Discussion) to post-writing aspects (journal selection and responding to reviewers). This provides a highly comprehensive guide.
* Global Relevance: The article aligns with global efforts for transparency in research reporting by referencing guidelines like the EQUATOR Network, which affirms the importance of high reporting standards.
* Educational Value: The journal takes on the role of an educator, not just a publisher. They acknowledge that writing difficulties are a real problem for researchers (especially non-native English speakers) and proactively take the initiative to address it through a structured 12-part series. This is a concrete example of responsible knowledge transfer. Quality & Credibility: The decision to base this writing tips series on existing literature (indicated by numerous references) and involve many experts (in the Acknowledgments section) demonstrates that the series possesses strong quality and a solid scientific foundation. It is not merely amateur tips and tricks. Focus on Process: It emphasizes that successful publication is the result of a structured process (from the initial stage to responding to reviewers). The chronological 12-point structure is extremely helpful for authors to understand that every step in the publication process requires a specific strategy. Scientific Writing Series (12 Points Structure)
1. How to get started
2. Introduction
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
6. References
7. Tables and figures
8. Selecting the journal
9. Cover letter
10. Choice of journal reviewers
11. Revision
12. Responding to reviewers
Muhamad Dzikry Raehan
ReplyDelete231250085
1. Logic
my ideas The article demonstrates strong logical organization. It begins by explaining the purpose of the new series on effective scientific writing, then moves smoothly into the problems faced by novice authors, the need for guidance, and the rationale for creating the series. Each paragraph is connected to the previous one through cause-and-effect reasoning.
Examples of logical flow include:
Identifying the struggle many researchers face → explaining the need for better guidance.
Stating that good content alone is insufficient → discussing additional factors that influence publication success.
Presenting the abundance of writing resources → explaining why beginners still lack clear direction.
Introducing the new series → describing how it will address the gaps.
This step-by-step structure makes the argument coherent and easy to follow.
Overall, the logical sequencing is strong, and ideas are developed consistently without contradictions.
2. Clarity
The article maintains high clarity throughout. The sentences are direct, the vocabulary is accessible to the academic audience, and the purpose of each paragraph is easy to identify. The authors clearly describe:
Why they created the series
What the series contains
Who the target audience is
What limitations the series has
The use of headings (such as Table 1) further helps the reader understand the content quickly. The writing avoids unnecessary jargon and communicates complex ideas in a simple manner. For example, they separate the sections “What you should know” and “What you should do,” which improves readability.
However, a few sentences are long and contain several ideas, which may challenge some readers. Even so, the overall clarity remains strong because the wording is precise and the message is consistently explicit.
3. Formality
The article uses an appropriate level of formality for a scientific journal. The language is objective, professional, and free from personal bias. It uses standard academic expressions such as:
“The primary target audience…”
“Various factors impact on successful writing and publishing…”
“The series aims to provide clear and concise key information…”
The authors avoid using casual or conversational phrases. They rely on factual statements, references, and established academic conventions. Citations are used correctly throughout the text, strengthening the formality and credibility of the article.
The tone remains neutral and scholarly, even when explaining personal motivation for creating the writing course. This maintains professionalism while helping readers understand the background.
Final Evaluation
Overall, the article fulfills the criteria of effective academic writing:
Its logical flow is strong, with ideas arranged in a meaningful, connected structure.
The clarity is high due to straightforward explanations, explicit purpose statements, and well-organized paragraphs.
The formality is appropriate for an academic audience, supported by objective language and correct citation practices.
The article successfully communicates its main goal: introducing a structured, accessible series to guide researchers in writing and publishing scientific papers.
If you want, I can also help create:
A summary
A critical review
A presentation slide version of the analysis
Just let me know!
ahmad fadhlur rahman sofyan
ReplyDelete(231250083)_MPI 5C
The article introduces a 12-part series published in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology designed to help novice and experienced researchers improve their scientific writing and publishing skills. It explains:
• The importance of effective scientific writing
• Common difficulties faced by researchers
• The gap between available guidelines and practical writing needs
• How the new series aims to provide concise, actionable tips (“What you should know” and “What you should do”)
• The target audience: mainly early-career researchers
• The usefulness of the series for improving clarity, transparency, and efficiency in research reporting
Overall, the article serves as a meta-guide, preparing readers for a structured set of upcoming writing tips.
The article maintains high clarity throughout. The sentences are direct, the vocabulary is accessible to the academic audience, and the purpose of each paragraph is easy to identify. The authors clearly describe:
Why they created the series
What the series contains
Who the target audience is
What limitations the series has
The use of headings (such as Table 1) further helps the reader understand the content quickly. The writing avoids unnecessary jargon and communicates complex ideas in a simple manner. For example, they separate the sections “What you should know” and “What you should do,” which improves readability.
However, a few sentences are long and contain several ideas, which may challenge some readers. Even so, the overall clarity remains strong because the wording is precise and the message is consistently explicit.
Here is the English translation of your commentary on the scientific writing tips series:
Core Value: This article serves as an eye-opener for researchers, especially junior researchers, regarding the high standards expected in scientific publication.
* Focus on Quality: The author explicitly states that effective and concise writing ability is crucial, even more important than a brilliant research design, for a manuscript to be accepted by a journal.
* Holistic Coverage: The proposed tips series covers the entire research process, ranging from the basic structure of a paper (Introduction, Methods, Discussion) to post-writing aspects (journal selection and responding to reviewers). This provides a highly comprehensive guide.
* Global Relevance: The article aligns with global efforts for transparency in research reporting by referencing guidelines like the EQUATOR Network, which affirms the importance of high reporting standards.
* Educational Value: The journal takes on the role of an educator, not just a publisher. They acknowledge that writing difficulties are a real problem for researchers (especially non-native English speakers) and proactively take the initiative to address it through a structured 12-part series. This is a concrete example of responsible knowledge transfer. Quality & Credibility: The decision to base this writing tips series on existing literature (indicated by numerous references) and involve many experts (in the Acknowledgments section) demonstrates that the series possesses strong quality and a solid scientific foundation. It is not merely amateur tips and tricks. Focus on Process: It emphasizes that successful publication is the result of a structured process (from the initial stage to responding to reviewers). The chronological 12-point structure is extremely helpful for authors to understand that every step in the publication process requires a specific strategy.
edSebuah Ade Susilawati
ReplyDelete231250087
Artikel ini pada dasarnya memperkenalkan “seri panduan penulisan ilmiah” yang akan diterbitkan dalam Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Isinya berfokus pada alasan pembuatan seri, siapa target pembaca, ruang lingkup, dan manfaat bagi peneliti pemula. Artikel juga menjelaskan bahwa banyak peneliti kesulitan menulis paper karena kurangnya panduan praktis, sehingga seri ini hadir sebagai solusi yang lebih ringkas dan langsung dapat dipakai.
Secara umum, artikel ini memberikan gambaran yang cukup lengkap tentang tujuan seri, latar belakang masalah, serta pentingnya kemampuan menulis dalam dunia akademik. Penulis juga memberikan konteks mengapa panduan ini diperlukan meskipun literatur tentang penulisan ilmiah sebenarnya sudah banyak.
Fathur Rahman
ReplyDelete231250075
The article provides a clear and informative introduction to a series on effective scientific writing and publishing. In terms of logical organization, the text is well structured and follows a coherent progression. It begins by explaining the purpose of the series, then discusses the challenges faced by novice researchers, and finally describes the scope and limitations of the upcoming writing tips. Each paragraph connects smoothly to the next, making the flow of ideas easy to follow.
Regarding clarity, the article communicates its message in a straightforward and concise manner. The authors successfully explain why such a series is needed despite the abundance of existing resources. They use accessible language, making the article suitable for both early-career and experienced researchers. The division between background explanation and practical advice is also clearly presented, which enhances the reader’s understanding of what the series aims to achieve.
In terms of formality, the writing adheres to the conventions of academic style. The tone is professional, objective, and consistent throughout the article. The authors avoid overly casual expressions and support their points with appropriate references, demonstrating academic credibility. Additionally, the article maintains formal structure by including citations, acknowledgments, and a reference list that meet scholarly standards.
Majriul haq
ReplyDelete231250096
This article provides a clear and well-structured introduction to a new series on effective scientific writing and publishing. The authors explain why many researchers—especially beginners—struggle with writing, and they justify the need for practical, concise guidance. The logic of the article is strong: it begins by outlining the problem, presents evidence for why writing support is necessary, and then describes how the upcoming series will address these needs.
In terms of clarity, the article communicates its goals effectively. The structure is straightforward, the purpose of the series is easy to understand, and the explanation of each component (e.g., the one-page format, the checklist, the “What you should know” and “What you should do” sections) is concise and accessible.
The formality level is appropriate for an academic audience. The tone is professional, objective, and informative. It uses academic vocabulary, references supporting literature, and maintains a consistent formal register. The article successfully balances informative content with readability, making it helpful for novice researchers while still maintaining academic standards.
memberikan pengantar yang logis dan sistematis tentang tujuan diterbitkannya seri panduan menulis ilmiah di Dari sisi logika, alur pemaparannya tersusun dengan baik: dimulai dari pentingnya publikasi ilmiah bagi peneliti, diikuti permasalahan yang umum dihadapi penulis, hingga solusi yang ditawarkan melalui seri artikel bulanan. Urutan ini membuat argumen penulis mudah diikuti dan terasa koheren.
ReplyDeleteDari segi kejelasan, artikel ini cukup efektif. Bahasa yang digunakan ringkas, informatif, dan langsung pada tujuan. Pembagian informasi—seperti penjelasan latar belakang, sasaran pembaca, serta struktur seri yang akan diterbitkan—disampaikan secara eksplisit tanpa ambiguitas. Penyajian daftar topik dalam tabel juga membantu pembaca memahami cakupan materi secara cepat dan terstruktur.
Dari aspek formalitas, artikel ini sudah memenuhi standar penulisan akademik. Gaya bahasanya objektif, menggunakan rujukan yang relevan, serta mempertahankan nada ilmiah yang konsisten. Menariknya, penulis juga menjelaskan bahwa seri ini akan menggunakan bentuk imperatif pada bagian saran, yang meskipun tidak lazim dalam jurnal ilmiah, tetap dapat diterima karena tujuannya bersifat praktis dan edukatif.
Secara keseluruhan, artikel ini efektif sebagai pengantar seri panduan penulisan ilmiah karena mampu menggabungkan logika yang kuat, kejelasan informasi, serta formalitas akademik yang tepat. Artikel ini sangat relevan bagi peneliti pemula maupun senior yang ingin meningkatkan kualitas penulisan dan peluang publikasi mereka.
This article provides a clear and well-structured overview of the purpose behind launching a series on effective scientific writing. The content is organized logically, beginning with the challenges faced by researchers, followed by the need for practical guidance, and ending with the scope of the upcoming series. In terms of logical coherence, the article presents a smooth flow of reasoning: problem, need, solution, benefits. Regarding clarity, the writing is concise and direct, supported by structured elements such as the table of contents, making the information easy to follow. In terms of formality, the tone remains appropriate for academic communication objective, informative, and supported by citations. Overall, the article is effective because it offers a systematic framework to help especially early-career researchers improve their scientific writing skills.
ReplyDeleteNama : siti zahra Maulida
ReplyDeleteNim:231250014
MPI A
Seri 12 bagian ini ditujukan terutama untuk peneliti akademis pemula. Tujuannya adalah memberikan informasi kunci yang jelas dan ringkas tentang semua aspek utama proses penulisan, mulai dari memulai draf hingga menanggapi komentar reviewer.
Setiap kiat akan disajikan dalam format satu halaman yang mudah dibaca, berisi latar belakang ("Apa yang harus Anda ketahui") dan saran ("Apa yang harus Anda lakukan").
Seri ini akan diterbitkan sebagai akses terbuka (open access) untuk mencapai jangkauan maksimum.
NAMA : Dinda Larasati
ReplyDeleteKELAS : MPI 5A
NIM : 231250024
1. Logic
The article presents ideas in a logical and organized sequence. It begins with a background explaining the importance of revising and rewriting in academic writing, followed by clear definitions, steps, important considerations, and benefits. Each section is connected and contributes to the overall topic. However, several parts still contain repetitive explanations that make the argument slightly circular. Strengthening the logical flow by avoiding repetition and adding specific examples would enhance the overall coherence.
2. Clarity
The content is generally clear and easy to understand. Definitions of *revising* and *rewriting* are explained in straightforward language, and the steps are written systematically so readers can follow the process. Despite this, some paragraphs are quite long and could be made clearer by dividing them into shorter sections or including examples of common errors. Also, a few expressions would benefit from more precise wording to avoid ambiguity. Overall, the article shows good clarity but still has room for improvement.
3. Formality
The article uses formal language appropriate for academic writing. The terms, structure, and tone are aligned with academic standards. However, there are several minor issues in spelling and consistency, such as typographical errors (“KESIMPUULAN”) that reduce the level of formality. A more concise and refined writing style would also strengthen its academic tone. Still, the article generally maintains a suitable level of formality for academic contexts.
Nama : Nova Safira
ReplyDeleteKelas : semester 5
Nim : 231250021
The article “Introducing a new series on effective writing and publishing of scientific papers” presents a clear and well-structured rationale for launching a series of writing tips aimed at novice researchers, emphasizing that scientific writing is often challenging despite the abundance of existing guidelines. The authors logically organize their discussion by outlining the problem, explaining the purpose of the series, and presenting the planned topics, which creates a coherent argumentative flow. In terms of clarity, the writing is generally precise and accessible, with straightforward explanations of the series' aims, scope, and limitations; however, some long sentences and repeated ideas could be refined for greater conciseness. The article maintains a consistently formal academic tone suitable for a scholarly journal, supported by appropriate references and objective language, although a few expressions such as “tips and tricks” introduce a slightly informal touch. Overall, the text is effective in fulfilling its purpose, demonstrating strong logical organization, high clarity, and appropriate academic formality while still allowing room for minor improvements in specificity and conciseness.
Nama: Muhamad Ferdiyanto
ReplyDeleteKelas: 5 MPI A
NIM: 231250015
My opinion from this article is:
- Logically, the content is well organized: it moves from the problem difficulty in writing, to the reason behind it lack of practical guidance, and finally to the solution a monthly series of tips. This logical flow makes the argument easy to follow.
- clarity,the authors use direct and straightforward language, avoiding unnecessary technical jargon, which helps readers understand the purpose of the series even if they are not experts in scientific writing. The article also explains the structure of the series (“What you should know” and “What you should do”), which adds to its transparency and readability.
- formality, the tone aligns well with academic standards objective, informative, and supported by references.
The inclusion of citations and acknowledgment of existing literature further strengthens its academic credibility. Overall, the article effectively introduces the writing-tip series and meets key criteria of academic writing: logical organization, clear communication, and appropriate formality.
nama : ipulloh
Deletenim : 231250028
kelas : mpi 5A
I think the content of this article is very effective in conveying its message, such as:
Logic: The authors of this article have a very strong reason for creating a series of writing tips. According to the article, writing scientific papers is difficult, even for experienced researchers. While many books and guides are available, they are often too general and don't immediately provide a clear picture of what to do. Therefore, they created a new series that is more practical, direct, and to the point to help young researchers. Furthermore, the language in the article is easy to understand.
Clarity: The text of this article is very clear. The authors immediately make it clear that their target audience is novice researchers, but this series can also be useful for experienced researchers who are mentoring others. They also mention that each article will be divided into two parts: "What you need to know" and "What you should do," and include a checklist in each article. This clarity makes readers immediately know what they will get from this series.
Formality: Although this article is academic, it is not stuffy. The authors use relatively straightforward and to-the-point language. They even employ a slightly personal tone, for example, when they recount their own experiences starting their writing careers and reviewing other people's manuscripts as members of the editorial board. This makes the article feel more honest and relevant. Despite this, the structure and content remain professional, complete with references to support their claims. Ultimately, the article successfully blends the required formality with a friendly and accessible tone.
Nama: Muhammad Difa Izzati
ReplyDeleteNIM: 231250023
Kelas: MPI 5A
Logic and Clarity (The "Storyline")
The goal is to provide editors, reviewers, and readers with a clear storyline.
The series aims to give a clear and concise overview of all major aspects of the process, which suggests a focus on logical structure.
The overall purpose is to offer tips for clear and concise writing and to support authors in getting their message across.
It acknowledges that a sometimes nonspecific abundance of information prevents young researchers from getting a clear overview, which the series intends to fix with clear, actionable advice.
Formality and Authority (The "Do's and Don'ts")
The advice uses the imperative ("What you should do"), which is unusual for the journal but fits the purpose of providing experience-based do's and don'ts. This suggests an authoritative, prescriptive tone aimed at giving direct, actionable instructions.
The tips are based on the authors' experience and observations as editorial board members and course developers, lending authority to the advice.
The purpose is to raise the likelihood of having a paper accepted by a good journal, implying adherence to the formal standards and expectations of scholarly publishing.
Teuku Faisal Rachmadani
ReplyDelete231250077
1. Content Overview
The article introduces a twelve-part series designed to guide novice and experienced researchers in writing and publishing scientific papers. It highlights common struggles in academic writing, explains the importance of effective communication in research, and outlines the structure of the upcoming series. It also emphasizes that good scientific content is not enough; the way research is written strongly influences its acceptance in reputable journals.
2. Logic
The article is logically structured. It begins by explaining the purpose of the series, then discusses the challenges faced by writers, and continues with the rationale for creating concise writing tips. Finally, it presents the scope and limitations of the series. Each paragraph follows a clear progression, moving from problem identification to solution offering. This strong logical flow helps readers easily understand why the series is needed.
3. Clarity
The article demonstrates high clarity. It uses straightforward academic language and avoids unnecessary complexity. Key explanations—such as the purpose of the series, its target audience, and its structure—are stated directly. The inclusion of a table listing the 12 topics also contributes to clarity. The article effectively balances background explanation with concise description, making it accessible even to novice researchers.
4. Formality
The writing maintains an appropriate level of academic formality. The tone is professional, objective, and respectful. It relies on evidence, cites previous literature, and avoids personal or emotional expressions. The authors also provide references to established guidelines (e.g., EQUATOR, CONSORT, STROBE), showing academic credibility and adherence to scholarly conventions.
5. Overall Evaluation
Overall, the article meets the criteria of effective academic writing. It is logical in structure, clear in language, and formal in tone. It successfully communicates its purpose and provides a strong foundation for the upcoming instructional series on scientific writing.
Content Summary
ReplyDeleteThe article introduces a new series of monthly writing tips in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. The purpose of the series is to guide novice and experienced researchers in writing and publishing scientific papers more effectively. It explains the importance of good academic writing, the challenges many researchers face, and how the new series will offer concise, structured advice to improve clarity, completeness, and transparency in scientific writing.
Effectiveness According to Academic Writing Criteria
The article is effective academic writing because it is logically structured, clearly written, and formal in tone. It successfully motivates the need for the writing-tips series while providing a clear pathway for how researchers can benefit from it. The use of evidence, guidelines, and references further strengthens its academic credibility.
Sulthonudin
ReplyDelete231250080
MPI 5C
The article “Introducing a New Series on Effective Writing and Publishing of Scientific Papers” presents a clear and well-structured overview of a monthly series published in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Its main purpose is to introduce practical guidance on scientific writing and publishing, especially for novice researchers, while remaining useful for more experienced academics as well.
In terms of logic, the article is logically organized. It begins by explaining the importance of scientific writing for researchers’ careers and for the advancement of knowledge, then identifies common problems faced by authors. After establishing this background, the authors logically introduce the new writing series as a solution and clearly describe its scope, structure, and limitations. This progression helps readers easily follow the authors’ line of reasoning and understand the relevance of the series.
Regarding clarity, the article is written in a very clear and accessible manner. Key ideas are explained concisely without unnecessary jargon. The use of straightforward language, short paragraphs, and explicit explanations of the series format (e.g., one-pager structure, checklists, and practical advice) makes the content easy to understand, particularly for novice researchers. The authors also clearly state what the series does and does not cover, which prevents misunderstanding.
In terms of formality, the article maintains an appropriate academic tone throughout. The language is professional, objective, and respectful, which is suitable for an academic journal. Although the authors mention that the series itself uses the imperative form, this explanation is given in a formal and justified way, aligning with the article’s instructional purpose. References to previous literature and reporting guidelines further strengthen its academic credibility.
Overall, the article is effective in academic writing because it demonstrates strong logic, high clarity, and appropriate formality. It successfully informs readers about the aims and value of the writing series and motivates researchers to improve their scientific writing and publishing skills.